In the age of AI, the problem is no longer just whether something is true or false. It's who governs that truth. And, above all, how you sustain it when you have to answer to others.
These past few days, Pere Vila i Fumás explained it with unusual clarity. I especially like that he writes from a place of quiet responsibility, not noise. He has a technical and executive track record that's hard to find today, with that mix of precision and sense of service the current moment needs.
In that context, he mentions Narratio for something very specific: because trust stops being a statement and becomes a trail.
He talks about traceability as a standard. About references. About being able to reconstruct what source backs a claim, what changed, when, why, and with what explainable confidence level. He even gets specific: VerifyFlow, TrustScore, and SourceBadge, Narratio's solutions. He doesn't mention them as loose names, but as a sign that the debate is already operational, not theoretical.
And on the eve of MWC 2026, this stops being an abstract discussion. When audits, CSRD, reputational risk, or business decisions are on the line, what counts is being able to prove it.
If you work in data, compliance, risk, or audit, here's the question we're leaving on the table: which part of the chain breaks for you today when you try to turn information into defensible evidence?